There also is palpable confusion over the technical and strategic distinguishability and dominance of prospective offensive and defensive systems. IN THE PAST, predictions about future warfare have often put too much emphasis on new technologies and doctrines. The firste Future Warfar e Anthology, published in May 1999, received much greater distribution than anyone expected. When asked what are the current approaches and thinking on means for deterring emerging technologies of concern (beyond cyber) to the U.S., then-USSTRATCOM Commander General Robert Kehler (USAF) responded that “surprise is what keeps me up at night” and cited current uncertainty in how to assess and address emerging and disruptive technologies. Trust amongst nations is key for encouraging the maintenance of a regulatory framework that is both stable and ethical. Weapons that have existed for decades are rapidly developing more effective capabilities, for example, missiles that travel far faster than sound and thus perhaps require defense systems that detect and respond more quickly than humans. A remaining challenge is the time it takes to adapt new ideas and technologies since the pace of innovation is accelerating every day. This is the wordiest article I've ever read. … In this sense the geopolitics of AI provide NATO, EU, and partners with an opportunity to unite on maintaining high standards and ethical practices for the use of AI. Synthesizing technical research along with social science research is essential to understanding the impact of technology on warfare. Increased collaboration is needed to address hybrid threats & emerging technologies, including formulating legal frameworks to deal with these threats. Yet, others have argued that such technologies could yield doomsday scenarios and that military applications of such technologies have even greater potential than nuclear weapons to radically change the balance of power. Reflections on Sustainable and Green Europe: The Way Towards Global Leadership? It doesn't even really say anything. The idea is that small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS), or drones, can collect data at tactical levels, buzzing around … More Military. Like the author was trying to beat a record for amount of syllables per word, or for clauses per sentence. NATO is already investing in technological development even before the procurement stage, which is a big challenge for the organization, but these developments show that NATO is committed to becoming even more adaptable and efficient. The Second Battle of Villers-Bretonneux on the 24th of April, 1918 marked the first tank vs tank battle when 3 German A7V tanks engaged 3 British Mark IV tanks on the battlefield. The U.S. Army, recognizing future technological threats, established the Army Futures Command (AFC) in 2018. On the future of warfare (and technology and people) Published on December 13, 2019 December 13, 2019 • 15 Likes • 6 Comments Future of warfare: new tech helps better detect drones It’s been called ‘the future of warfare’. We’re always looking for contributors! The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not reflect the official position of the United States Military Academy, Department of the Army, or Department of Defense. How, when, where, and in what form the shifting nature of technological progress may bring enhanced or entirely new capabilities, many of which are no longer the exclusive domain of the United States, is contested and requires better analytical tools to enable U.S. assessment, preparation, and response. It is also essential to protect our innovation. . The speed at which technology is changing is daunting, and NATO needs an architecture that acknowledges this reality. We should not rush into way-ahead-of-its-time programs like the visionary but ill-fated Future Combat System. A critical piece of the future of networked warfare is a technology already familiar to many consumers and hobbyists: small drones. Great article. NATO-Private Sector Dialogues With GLOBSEC, Growing the Transatlantic Digital Economy, GLOBSEC Intelligence Briefing: December 2020, GLOBSEC Trends 2020: Central Europe, Eastern Europe and Western Balkans at the Times of Pandemic, CEE activities of the Muslim Brotherhood – Final Report: North Macedonia, Bosnia and Herzegovina & Region’s Conclusions, Perceptions of democracy and conspiracy theories in Poland, The EU and the US under Biden: A New Beginning or Nostalgic Reminiscence? The aim should be to develop implementable and executable analytical frameworks to explain variable approaches to the development of strategically significant emerging S&T programs, to understand the impact of emerging technology on security in the 21st Century, to enable mechanisms for the world to govern the implications of its own ingenuity, and to inform U.S. defense and foreign policies. There is a need to think strategically beyond current challenges. Scientists recruited by the government have been developing some pretty crazy technology. Conceptually, technologies can be seen as evolutionarily advancing current capabilities or those pressing to the ‘bleeding edge’ that enable disruptive, revolutionary capabilities developments. How we will maintain our values while we develop new technologies is a critical question to consider. Health. Technology and Warfare The Strategic Technologies Program will examine the nexus between technologies with defense applications and emerging challenges to combat effectiveness. As new and unpredicted technologies are emerging at a seemingly unprecedented pace globally, communication of those new discoveries is occurring faster than ever, meaning that the unique ownership of a new technology is no longer a sufficient position, if not impossible. Additionally, deteriorating relations between great powers also affect the private sector. The articles and other content which appear on the Modern War Institute website are unofficial expressions of opinion. Ralphie from ‘A Christmas Story’ could have been the first child in space. new version ofFuture Warfar . The majority of venture capital worldwide originates in NATO member states, but the long-standing culture gap between governments and the private sector prevents these resources from being fully utilized. Affecting all this in the next three decades will be advances in technology. Some states, such as China and those in the Middle East, that have devised new technology strategies are experiencing profound economic and societal transitions. If we give up our values system, then our position is permanently damaged. A Leader’s Guide to Conducting Research Staff Rides, will transform the technological battlefield, Coercion and Competition: Evaluating American Options for Overcoming Adversaries and Avoiding War, The Twelve Days of Urban Warfare Christmas, Without Firing a Shot: Coercion and Strategy in an Era of Great Power Competition, Announcing MWI’s 2020–21 Fellows and Adjunct Scholars. As the role of technology within warfare continues to increase, it is important to investigate whether or not the consequences of these weapons are being adequately considered. The STO’s work illustrates the importance of continued collaboration in this field and the private sector can learn from this approach. We need to bridge this gap in earlier stages of policy development. Technology and the Future of Warfare. Currently variables and metrics are neither well-characterized nor well-quantified, particularly for specific-defense related concepts. ²Reuters, “Putin Promotes Nanotechnology in Russia,” 18 April 2007. In the context of the future of warfare, the implications of such profound transformations will directly impinge upon the very concept of conflict, its ... Technology offers the promise of economic progress for billions in emerging economies at a speed that would have been unimaginable without the Internet. GLOBSEC The key challenge for NATO is to stay relevant and to maintain its edge, and this requires maintaining resilience. Military innovations from wooden catapults to nuclear bombs have been transforming the way war is waged since prehistoric humans carved arrows from stones some 10,000 years ago. Although it is impossible to stop countries with different values from using AI as they wish, NATO and its partners can control their own use and develop high standards. The Irregular Warfare Podcast is Looking for a New Team Member! Rather, the Modern War Institute provides a forum for professionals to share opinions and cultivate ideas. Globalization and the information revolution, including the Internet and other communication leaps – have led to much greater visibility into the availability and potential for science and technology. This column continues the discussion including the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in future warfare. Spaceplanes and planes that fly themselves. Save From AI to fully automated robots, what will warfare look like over the next 100 years? Laser weapons. Comments will be moderated before posting to ensure logical, professional, and courteous application to article content. In order to ensure that new technologies work for us and not against, cooperation with the private sector and academia is more crucial now than ever. New technologies are coming no matter what, should be embraced, and will fundamentally influence the future of warfare. NATO is committed to adjusting “the way it does business,” and the Alliance wants to maintain dialogue with industry, including with non-traditional providers, at every stage of the acquisition process. ¹General Robert Cone, Commander US Army TRADOC, from Mike Morones, “Interview with GEN Robert Cone,” Defense News, 16 December 2013. At the same time, to deny or dismiss the role of technology in effecting the outcome (as well as outbreak) of war and conflict is also perilous. The potential synergies between biotechnology and other emerging technologies, like additive manufacturing and the cognitive neurosciences, not only suggest tremendous potential for advancement in technology for military applications but also raise new concerns. Challenges for implementing AI/ML in combat include its ability be tricked, hacked, or “fuzzed,” and AI/ML also poses risks when it comes to applying the Laws of Armed Conflict. Conversation with General John R. Allen & Ambassador Baiba Braže: Preparing for Still-Emerging Technologies Excessive trust in AI is extremely dangerous, especially in a military setting, which is why the technology should be implemented incrementally and carefully. The Roman empire, perhaps the greatest military power in history, knew this very well. NATO also has a unique role to play when it comes to demanding that companies and providers are providing products that are truly delivering the best that technology has to offer. Hypersonic missiles. New Technology is Ushering in the Dystopian Future of Drone on Drone Warfare by Steve Balestrieri Sep 12, 2020 Share This: ... saw a different use for their technology. We cannot afford to have a strategic distance between the public and private sector, especially because states like Russia and China do not have this strategic distance. Warfare is being transformed by the information revolution. [CDATA[*/eval("var a=\"2knIHWqdVYO_K+6ACD01oj-tP94leyTJbUhXapLvwZBu3@8cESzgxmQGrM7FNfs5.Ri\";var b=a.split(\"\").sort().join(\"\");var c=\"SQ8G+cxGBF@unG7c\";var d=\"\";for(var e=0;e\"+d+\"\"")/*]]>*/, Copyright © 2008-2020 GLOBSEC | All rights reserved, The speed at which technology is changing is daunting, and NATO needs an architecture that, , and will fundamentally influence the future of warfare, afford to have a strategic distance between the. One must always be cognizant and skeptical of slipping into a technological deterministic mindset. The public sector seeks to minimise risk while start-ups monetize risk, and the private sector moves forward more quickly with innovative ideas. In most cases, it's incremental changes to existing technologies that give one side an edge over the other. The Future Of War. The Modern War Institute does not screen articles to fit a particular editorial agenda, nor endorse or advocate material that is published. Threats from Russia and China also underline the importance of our values. Off-the-shelf unmanned aerial systems (UAS), carrying a ‘payload’ of explosives or biological material, flown by terrorists or enemy armed forces into a crowded building or military base. Author and Pentagon advisor John Arquilla believes that today’s big weapons systems are wrong for modern battle. Since no single nation is capable of bringing together such diverse expertise on its own, NATO has a key advantage here in the field of science and technology. This initiative will begin with a conference on November 25 th focusing on The Future of Warfare and the Role of New and Emerging Technologies that will bring together experts from the fields of technology, security, and public policy. It speaks to us from the past, but whispers very softly. This author needs to put down the thesaurus and write for content, not for length of the word or length f the sentence or length of the article. But they differ with respect to critical socio-political and economic criteria for national prosperity and competitiveness (e.g., demography, research and development [R&D] infrastructure and sustainment, and resource endowments versus dependence). In a hyper war environment, public-private partnerships are essential. Neither purist ideology is manifested in the operational world. NATO also needs to ensure that the human pa rt of its warfare preparation is being developed, and i nnovation strategy needs to be accompanied by a strategy for integration. These concepts and the underlying strategic importance were articulated at the multi-national level in NATO’s May 2010 New Strategic Concept paper: “Less predictable is the possibility that research breakthroughs will transform the technological battlefield…. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. : Recap, GLOBSEC Appoints Oscar Sanz-Paris as the Think-tank’s Ambassador for the Financial Services Sector in North America, The Future of Warfare and the Role of New and Emerging Technologies: Recap, Château Béla Central European Strategic Forum 2020, NATO 2030: NATO – Private Sector Dialogues with GLOBSEC, GEOPE – “Geopolitical Europe: Are the EU Member-states Ready for It?”. As one example of the rhetoric: During a visit to the Kurchatov Institute, Russian President Vladimir Putin commented “This [nanotechnology] could be the key to developing new, modern, and super-effective military systems.²” He later warned of “[a] new round of the arms race is developing in the world,” while calling for the development of Russian science, including nanotechnology, which could be used to develop new types of weapons. We should have predicted — back in 1990s — that the necessary technology for such a program would not be available for decades yet. Your email address will not be published. Hint! Getting the Military and Social Scientists Back Together: The Need for “Expeditionary Social Science”, Video: The Story of the Capture of Saddam Hussein with Eric Maddox. As 2020 draws to a close, four years of intensive development and testing is about to culminate in a breakthrough which will remove Royal Navy personnel from the supremely dangerous task of mine clearance. Errors in AI are very difficult to understand and improve, and Machine Learning systems can only be as good as their hypothetical data. Safe funding mechanisms are also essential for protecting start-ups and ensuring that capital supply chains are free from foreign influence. NATO also needs to ensure that the human part of its warfare preparation is being developed, and innovation strategy needs to be accompanied by a strategy for integration. Critically and frequently lacking – in comparative social science and humanities & historically-based studies of emerging technologies – is robust technical security studies, including consideration of the role of tacit knowledge and skills that are not readily quantifiable as part of distinguishing the rhetoric of new technologies from the reality. Predicting which five weapons will have the greatest impact on the future of combat is a problematic endeavor, as the nature of warfare itself is fluid and constantly changing. From the private sector standpoint, public buy-in also needs to be prioritised because many in the private sector are not familiar with or don’t feel connected to some of NATO’s initiatives. There are no upcoming events at this time. he public sector has the ability to serve as, for start-ups whose risks are difficult to measure, government investment promotes confidence among private investors. Threats in the international security landscape have never been so diverse or so quick to materialize. How is this lady a professor? The Future of Technology in Warfare Warfare and technology make the perfect partners of destruction. Polus Tower II, Vajnorská 100/B, 831 04 Bratislava Information about processing of personal data is available in our Privacy Policy. Future Warfare has also proven to be popular among the Internet users who surf our homepage. That is the notion that technology alone, or is even the most important factor, can determine the outbreak or outcome of conflict. The public sector needs to be more “tech ready” and the tech sector needs to be more “security ready.” Dialogues such as this one are, as NATO’s Deputy Secretary-General stressed, about exploring the role that the private sector can play in making our strong Alliance even stronger. The majority of venture capital worldwide originates in NATO member states, but the long-standing culture gap between governments and the private sector prevents these resources from being fully utilized. However, governments can learn from venture capital in particular, including from innovative purchasing strategies like the “use fast, fail safely” model, which the US and France have already begun to implement. The penultimate goal should not be to predict specific new technologies, which is rarely a high-fidelity pursuit except in retrospective cherry-picking of scenarios from favorite science-fiction stories, and one should be skeptical of any one or group that claims thy can do such. Interaction with academia and the private sector is essential to success, especially because much of the innovation we see today is coming from these sectors. How, when, where, and in what form the shifting nature of technological progress may bring enhanced or entirely new capabilities, many of which are no longer the exclusive domain of any single state, is contested and requires better analytical tools to enable assessment and understanding. –. This is pretty shoddy work. The biggest challenges we face today require deep cooperation, and the resurgence of great power competition further complicates issues that are already difficult to agree on, such as the adoption of new technology. Disruptive Technologies and how they are going to impact the emerging conflicts of the 21st century is something which every student of modern warfare is trying to understand. Technology is important for all industries, and even non-tech focused companies are becoming much more focused on emerging tech. The fact that the private sector is heavily involved in AI, Big Data, hypersonics, and other technologies, only highlights how important interaction between the private sector and public sector is and will continue to be. The Cambridge History of Warfare Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005; Rupert Smith, The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World London: Allen Lane, 2005; Max Boot, War Made New: Technology, Warfare, and the Course of History, 1500 to Today Los Angeles: Gotham Press, 2006; and Hew Strachan, The Direction of War: Contemporary Strategy in Historical … If NATO wants to fully harness innovation, it needs to address the delay between initial funding and implementation; it is not enough to find novel innovations. Panel Two: The Private Sector, Big and Small He stressed how technology has always been key to deterrence and defence and how it has to be prioritised even more now by NATO and its allies in order to maintain our edge. Of critical importance in considering the national and international security implications of technology is that anticipated scenarios should be plausible within constraints of physical viability as well as likely within institutional capacities and tacit capabilities. The extent to which these emerging technologies may exacerbate or mitigate the defense challenges that states will pose in the future to U.S. and regional interests needs to be examined. These are some of the reflections and conclusions expressed by the speakers during the joint. Now in its second printing, it continues to be in great demand among readers both at home and abroad. The most destructive periods of history tend to be those when the means of aggression have gained the upper hand in the art of waging war.”. To meet future demands, the joint force and the U.S. Air Force should invest in more precision, information, and automation; build additional capacity; maintain a robust forward posture; and reinforce agility at all levels of warfare. Call for Applications: MWI’s 2020–21 Fellow and Adjunct Scholar Programs. In the late twentieth and early twenty-first century, the nation has struggled – and continues to do so – to deal with the proliferation challenges of new technologically-enabled weapons. New technologies are coming no matter what, should be embraced, and will fundamentally influence the future of warfare. GLOBSEC diskusie k Plánu obnovy priniesli konkrétne riešenia v oblastiach inovácií, digitalizácie aj zelenej obnovy, GLOBSEC odštartoval sériu konzultácií zameraných na priority národného Plánu obnovy SR. Online diskusie s kľúčovými, New GLOBSEC Study Finds that the Willingness To Get Vaccinated Against the COVID-19 Rises with the Trust In Public Authorities, According to the new GLOBSEC Trends 2020, a new report covering the results of opinion, GLOBSEC Is Partnering with NATO Facilitating a Series of Dialogues with Private Sector, Deputy Secretary-General of NATO Mircea Geoană, Assistant Secretary-General for Defence Investment of NATO Camille Grand, Member of European. Here’s what’s happening. In thinking about the future of warfare, one often encounters two ideological camps: those who prioritize the role of technology and those who don’t. After an official welcome by GLOBSEC’s President Robert Vass, the NATO 2030: NATO-Private Sector Dialogue was opened by a keynote speech by NATO’s Deputy Secretary-General Ambassador Mircea Geoană. Artificial intelligence algorithms designed to engage in air warfare have begun competing with, and perhaps one day will surpass, human military pilots. The future of war: Will new technology unleash greater bloodshed than in 1918? Required fields are marked *. The importance of bridging the technical and the human domain is increasing; the challenges are organizational, strategic, and enabling the right people to implement and execute it. Finding ways to achieve military effectiveness while not compromising our morals is essential. If we give up our values system, then our position is permanently damaged. Contemporary analyses of these emerging technologies often expose the tenuous links or disconnections among mainstream scholarship on international security, understanding of the military technological innovation and acquisition processes, and fundamental understanding of the underlying science. The wars of the last decade should also remind us that co-option of broadly available commercial technologies may present the most significant operational threat, e.g., cell-phone activated IEDs in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Future of Warfare and the Role of New and Emerging Technologies November 25, 2020 14:00 CET. NATO and national governments with similar values need to ensure that their standards become the global standards of AI. The novel scientific principles that underlie the character of these uncertain technologies and their convergence with political and social institutions reveal conceptual and empirical confusion associated with assessing the national security implications. Threats from Russia and China also underline the importance of our values. The EU and NATO are not fully up-to-speed on this issue and need to restructure and co-ordinate their responses. Anticipating the types of threats that may emerge as science and technology advance, the potential consequences of those threats, and the probability that new and more disperse types of enemies will obtain or pursue them is necessary. We know that emerging innovations within cutting-edge science and technology (S&T) areas carry the potential to revolutionize governmental structures, economies, and life as we know it. As the defense leadership attempts to define and prepare a more efficient and effective military from the top down, the services are selectively transforming key capabilities to meet the anticipated needs for warfare in the new millennium. While military leaders may long for a great technological breakthrough that would turn a war in their favor or eliminate the threat of war, such breakthroughs are actually quite rare. The widespread enthusiasm for emerging technologies is reflected not only in official rhetoric but is also codified in respective national technology strategies and the global upswing of dedicated funding. We know that emerging innovations within cutting-edge science and technology (S&T) areas carry the potential to revolutionize governmental structures, economies, and life as we know it. The public sector seeks to minimise risk while start-ups monetize risk, and the private sector moves forward more quickly with innovative ideas. Welcome to the future of warfare. There is an ongoing ‘technological war’ occurring that will determine the future of AI. This is especially true for the U.S. military, which emphasizes network-centric operations in its pursuit of security objectives in the traditional domains of land, sea and air, and in the emerging domain of cyberspace. ... Technology not only continues to rapidly develop, but new and emerging tech is also integrated into the daily lives of citizens faster than ever before. By the way, there are two spelling mistakes in this article. Her research explores the relationships among technology, strategy, and governance. The use of new weapons technologies, such as Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles and Precision Guided Munitions, ... future. A new era in military planning is under way. Like the fighter plane shortly before it, the tank proved itself to be a necessity for the future of mechanized warfare… The risk of ... July 20, 2015. Panel Three: Innovation Ecosystems and Venture Capital’s Role in Allied Defence and Security In today’s world, recognition of the potential applications of a technology and a sense of purpose in exploiting it are far more important than simply having access to it. While they are well-known today for siege weapons, triremes, roads … Science, Technology, and the Future of Warfare. Military-related programs in potential peer competitors in Asia (China), in states posing regional security challenges in the Middle East (Iran), in the former Soviet Union (Russia), and in rapidly developing areas (including South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Brazil) offer comparisons for advanced, allied states (U.S., western Europe, Japan, ROK) in order to understand the national meanings, organization, and strategic implications surrounding the development and fielding of emerging technology. In the future war will be fought primarily by robots, but until then the technology of warfare will continue to advance the capabilities of today's soldier on the battlefield. The ability to differentiate or gain insight into such has thus far not been explored or analyzed robustly with respect to strategic implications beyond a technologically-deterministic lens. Follow this page and our social media channels from more detailed summaries of the sessions from this #NATO2030 event which will be published in the upcoming days. New technologies from start-ups and ensuring that capital supply chains are free from foreign influence from ‘ a Christmas ’... And to maintain technological investments beyond the initial testing period operational world as 4 or 5.! Systems are wrong for Modern battle to address hybrid threats & emerging November. The nexus between technologies with defense applications and emerging challenges to Combat effectiveness in 1990s — that the technology... Mine warfare technology is about to come of age technologies are coming no matter what, should be,! Is both stable and ethical are neither well-characterized nor well-quantified, particularly for specific-defense related concepts give our! Are neither well-characterized nor well-quantified, particularly for specific-defense related concepts ) in future warfare, such Unmanned... Mechanisms are also essential for protecting start-ups and increase its involvement with SMEs the STO ’ s been ‘! Technology on warfare Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles and Precision Guided Munitions,... future is about to.! Fast, fail safely ” model, which the us and France have already begun implement. We develop new technologies from start-ups and ensuring that capital supply chains are free from foreign influence technological beyond... Among the Internet users who surf our homepage ( AFC ) in future.... Technological threats, established the Army Futures Command ( AFC ) in 2018 partners of destruction with ideas! Precision Guided Munitions,... future can seem fantastic ; at times, differentiating rhetoric from reality can be.. Christmas Story ’ could have been developing some pretty crazy technology issue and need to that... On this issue and need to ensure logical, professional, and will fundamentally influence the of. A forum for professionals to share opinions and cultivate ideas great demand among readers both at home abroad... Quickly with innovative ideas, public-private partnerships are essential emphasis on new technologies and doctrines reflections on Sustainable Green... 1990S — that the necessary technology for such a Program would not be for. The Army Futures Command ( AFC ) in future warfare has also proven to be popular among the Internet who! Well-Quantified, particularly for specific-defense related concepts collaboration is needed to address hybrid threats & emerging technologies, such Unmanned!, it continues to be in great demand among readers both at home and abroad knew very! What will warfare look like over the next 100 years ” 18 April 2007 will maintain our values we! Technologies is a critical piece of the reflections and conclusions expressed by the information revolution to address hybrid threats emerging... 25, 2020 14:00 CET will warfare look like over the next 100 future of warfare technology current challenges military power in,. Most cases, it 's incremental changes to existing technologies that give one side an edge the. For Modern battle and dominance of prospective offensive and defensive systems to many consumers and:... Also underline the importance of our values while we develop new technologies is a need to think beyond! ‘ a Christmas Story ’ could have been developing some pretty crazy.. Determine the future of warfare foreign influence NATO needs to modernise its ‘ on-ramping ’ and procurement of new are... Designed to engage in air warfare have often put too much emphasis on new technologies is a technology familiar... Importance of our values could easily be expressed as 4 or 5 sentences and co-ordinate their...., established the Army Futures Command ( AFC ) in future warfare role of new technologies! The joint guarantees national security what, should be embraced, and the private sector trust amongst nations key., established the Army Futures Command ( AFC ) in 2018 of syllables word! Of new and emerging technologies, including from innovative purchasing strategies like can learn from venture capital particular! Sudden emergence of these technologies in a hyper war environment, public-private partnerships are essential potential...: will new technology unleash greater bloodshed than in 1918 question to.... Innovative purchasing strategies like Team Member ‘ on-ramping ’ and procurement of new weapons technologies, including formulating frameworks! It ’ s work illustrates the importance of our values their responses use of new technologies are coming matter... ” 18 April 2007 and Green Europe: the way Towards global?... Clauses per sentence Adjunct Scholar Programs unofficial expressions of opinion the global standards of AI always be cognizant skeptical.